From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753058AbdJHUox (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 8 Oct 2017 16:44:53 -0400
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:36326 "EHLO
        mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751568AbdJHUow (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 8 Oct 2017 16:44:52 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,496,1500933600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="295072352"
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 22:44:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
cc: Liam Breck <liam@networkimprov.net>, pali.rohar@gmail.com,
        Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
        cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] detect identical chip data arrays
In-Reply-To: <20171008203258.y7kqx7ipondxlsix@earth>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710082243140.2160@hadrien>
References: <1507490321-24900-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <20171008203258.y7kqx7ipondxlsix@earth>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Sebastian Reichel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 09:18:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Rename battery.cocci as check_bq27xxx_data.cocci and adjust the warning
> > messages to indicate that some structures are the same, in response to
> > feedback from Liam Breck.
> >
> > Although check_bq27xxx_data.cocci says is requires Coccinelle 1.0.7, which
> > is not yet released, it actually works with the version currently available
> > on Github, eg from Coccinelle commit 3ba77b3a0f91.
>
> I think the rename makes sense, but I would expect the move to
> happen in one go with "git send-email -M", so that it detects the
> rename.

I'm not actually sure what is the status of the previous version.
Masahiro said applied, but I downloaded his tree and it was not there.  So
I thought this way would be easier.

julia