Re: Regression in linux-next

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 03:54 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Hrm. I completely forgot that this does not dump the buffers of offline
> > > CPUs. So half of the information is missing. So forget the tracer for now.
> > > 
> > > Can you please apply the debug patch below and provide the full dmesg
> > > output?
> > > 
> > > Its going to be too big for LKML so either upload it somewhere or send it
> > > to me in private mail.
> > > 
> > > Note, I removed the BUG_ON, so box might survive suspend/resume but it
> > > should trigger that printout.
> > Forgot to add the counterpart to the clear side. Updated patch below.
> 
> http://paste.debian.net/991048/

Thanks for providing the data! Does the patch below fix the issue?

Thanks,

	tglx

8<---------------

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ static void free_moved_vector(struct api
 
 	trace_vector_free_moved(apicd->irq, vector, managed);
 	irq_matrix_free(vector_matrix, cpu, vector, managed);
-	__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_UNUSED);
+	per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = VECTOR_UNUSED;
 	hlist_del_init(&apicd->clist);
 	apicd->prev_vector = 0;
 	apicd->move_in_progress = 0;