mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	He Chen <he.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v3] x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id array
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:03:03 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710201058570.1882@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171019155713.27097-3-prarit@redhat.com>

On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>  static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu)
>  {
> -	int sibling;
> +	int phys_pkg_id, sibling;
>  	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
>  
>  	for_each_cpu(sibling, topology_core_cpumask(cpu)) {
> @@ -1529,6 +1526,12 @@ static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu)
>  	cpumask_clear(topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
>  	c->phys_proc_id = 0;
>  	c->cpu_core_id = 0;
> +
> +	phys_pkg_id = c->phys_pkg_id;
> +	c->phys_pkg_id = U16_MAX;

This leaves c->logical_proc_set = 1, which is inconsistent at best. I have
no idea why we need this logical_proc_set flag at all.

> +	if (topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(phys_pkg_id) < 0)
> +		logical_packages--;

Now this has another issue. Depending on hotplug ordering the logical
package association can change across hotplug operations. I don't know it
that's an issue, but this needs to be analyzed before we merge that.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-20  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-19 15:57 [PATCH 0/3 v3] x86/smpboot: Fix panic in __max_logical_packages estimate Prarit Bhargava
2017-10-19 15:57 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Cache logical pkg id in uncore driver Prarit Bhargava
2017-10-19 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/3 v3] x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id array Prarit Bhargava
2017-10-20  9:03   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-10-23 19:59     ` Prarit Bhargava
2017-10-19 15:57 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate Prarit Bhargava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1710201058570.1882@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=he.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®