From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-abi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can we break RDPID/RDTSCP ABI ASAP and see if it's okay?
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 10:08:17 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710290952440.1922@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWZBzjw=sGT0SX29NtR+Ki+-eWEH_Yrphzrmi7dLFaBtg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> We currently do this on boot:
>
> write_rdtscp_aux((node << 12) | cpu);
>
> This *sucks*. It means that, to very quickly obtain the CPU number
> using RDPID, an ALU op is needed. It also doesn't bloody work on
> systems with more than 4096 CPUs.
>
> IMO it should be ((u64)node << 32) | cpu. Then getting the CPU number is just:
That breaks 32bit
> RDPID %rax
> MOVL %eax, %eax
>
> I'm thinking about this because rseq users could avoid ever *loading*
> the rseq cacheline if they used RDPID to get the CPU number, and it
> would be nice to give them a sane way to do it.
>
> This won't break any existing RDPID users if we do it quickly because
> there aren't any (the CPUs aren't available). I would be a bit
> surprised if anyone uses RDTSCP for this because it's absurdly slow.
What we can do on 64bit is:
((u64) cpu << 32) | (node << 12) | (cpu & 0xfff)
That does not solve the ALU op problem but works on both 32 and 64 bit and
on systems with more than 4096 CPUs.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-29 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-28 19:38 Andy Lutomirski
2017-10-28 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-29 9:08 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-11-13 13:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-13 18:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1710290952440.1922@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-abi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®