From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: make DEBUG_FILE option more useful
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 21:02:12 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711082102030.2268@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASw=ECjKxwemiF904HeR5B_FUGGPxjZY3brH66iMs=9+Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-10-26 13:02 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Julia,
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-10-15 18:55 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>:
> >> > Make coccicheck checked for the existence of DEBUG_FILE on each semantic
> >> > patch, and bailed if it already existed. This meant that DEBUG_FILE was
> >> > useless for checking more than one semantic patch at a time. Now the check
> >> > is moved to the start of make coccicheck, and the 2> is changed to a 2>> to
> >> > append to the file on each semantic patch. Furthermore, the spatch command
> >> > that is run for each semantic patch is also added to the DEBUG_FILE, to
> >> > make clear what each stdout trace corresponds to.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> >> >
> >>
> >> I think this is a good improvement,
> >> and looks almost good to me.
> >>
> >> Just one nit.
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +if [ "$DEBUG_FILE" != "/dev/null" -a "$DEBUG_FILE" != "" ]; then
> >> > + if [ -f $DEBUG_FILE ]; then
> >> > + echo "Debug file $DEBUG_FILE exists, bailing"
> >> > + exit
> >> > + fi
> >> > + touch $DEBUG_FILE
> >>
> >> I think this "touch" is redundant.
> >>
> >> If the DEBUG_FILE does not exist, 2>> will automatically create it.
> >
> > Thanks very much for the feedback. I will resubmit.
> >
> > julia
> >
> >
>
> Remove the redundant "touch"
> and applied to linux-kbuild/misc.
Thanks!
julia
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-08 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-15 9:55 Julia Lawall
2017-10-26 1:49 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-10-26 4:02 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-07 0:24 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-11-08 13:02 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1711082102030.2268@hadrien \
--to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®