From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: use ktime_get_real_fast_ns() instead of __getnstimeofday()
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:04:24 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711100801330.2690@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKs2UWcjLwMq+_94etrQhiZs=x79tL251d1L=5t4DYkUg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >> > Hmm, no. None of the regular accessor functions can be called from NMI
> >> > context safely.
> >>
> >> Right, that's what I mean: it must not get called from NMI context, but it
> >> currently is, at least for this case:
> >>
> >> NMI handler:
> >> something bad
> >> panic()
> >> kmsg_dump()
> >> pstore_dump()
> >> pstore_record_init()
> >> __getnstimeofday()
> >>
> >> I should probably add that to the changelog text ;-)
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> Er, so, is this safe to call there? I've had to fix this a few times
> now, so if using ktime_get_real_fast_ns() can be used here (and
> doesn't return 0) then this is easily an improvement over the existing
> "maybe read 0" case pstore has now.
ktime_get_real_fast_ns() is NMI safe and returns
before timekeeping_suspend(): correct time
after timekeeping_suspend(): timestamp which was frozen in
timekeeping_suspend()
after timekeeping_resume(): correct time
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-10 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-08 16:00 Arnd Bergmann
2017-11-09 0:55 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-09 12:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-11-09 23:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-09 23:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-11-10 0:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-10 1:04 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-10 7:04 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1711100801330.2690@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®