From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756335AbdKNXEb (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:04:31 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:39565 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752838AbdKNXEW (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:04:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:04:18 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Linus Torvalds cc: Mark Salyzyn , Petr Mladek , LKML , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Prarit Bhargava , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [GIT pull] printk updates for 4.15 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20171114100336.uil744pxmbsawq63@pathway.suse.cz> <7d23f705-1479-7874-7918-f2af9ec02c86@android.com> <7f0e0165-2b22-f2cf-ce6e-8db3d7325973@android.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > Something like the untested patch below should do the storage and converts > > the primary timestamp from local_clock() to clock monotonic. > > This may work. > > > - u64 ts_nsec; /* timestamp in nanoseconds */ > > + /* Timestamps in nanoseconds */ > > + union { > > + u64 ts_nsec; > > + struct timestamps ts; > > + }; > > But I'd skip the union, and just search-and-replace the ts_nsec -> > ts.mono. You did that in at least one place anyway. > > Because as it is, that's just too subtle and hard to read. Don't make > it worse by having a magical "ts_nsec is also ts.mono, but you have to > look in two different files to see that. > > That file is messy enough as-is. True. I already replaced all of them except this one: @@ -1022,6 +1026,7 @@ void log_buf_vmcoreinfo_setup(void) */ VMCOREINFO_STRUCT_SIZE(printk_log); VMCOREINFO_OFFSET(printk_log, ts_nsec); + VMCOREINFO_OFFSET(printk_log, ts); VMCOREINFO_OFFSET(printk_log, len); VMCOREINFO_OFFSET(printk_log, text_len); VMCOREINFO_OFFSET(printk_log, dict_len); If I remove ts_nsec completely, then the VMCORE info changes and that would break existing tools because they search for ts_nsec and fail.... Thanks, tglx