From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932272AbdKOKfz (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:35:55 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:41042 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932239AbdKOKfs (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:35:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:35:42 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jarkko Sakkinen cc: intel-sgx-kernel-dev@lists.01.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, LKML , x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Intel SGX Driver In-Reply-To: <20171113194528.28557-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20171113194528.28557-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: Any reason why you did not CC the x86 maintainers and other x86 developers who have had opinions on the first attempt to get SGX into the kernel? This is not some driver for a random peripheral. This has substantional effects. I'm assuming you simply forgot or were not aware, but this is not the way this works. Thanks, tglx