From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751131AbdKTIjL (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 03:39:11 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:57204 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750952AbdKTIjJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 03:39:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:38:45 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Mathieu Desnoyers cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Watson , linux-kernel , linux-api , Paul Turner , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Hunter , Andi Kleen , Chris Lameter , Ben Maurer , rostedt , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Kerrisk Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.15 04/24] Restartable sequences: x86 32/64 architecture support In-Reply-To: <1390396579.17843.1511113291117.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Message-ID: References: <20171114200414.2188-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20171114200414.2188-5-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1390396579.17843.1511113291117.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Nov 16, 2017, at 4:14 PM, Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > > Please fix the subject line: > > > > x86: Add support for restartable sequences > > > > or something like that. > > > > And for the actual rseq patches please come up with a proper short > > susbsytem prefix for restartable sequences. There is no point in occupying > > half of the subject space for a prefix. > > ok. done. > > > > > Other than that. > > > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner > > Thanks! Should I apply the reviewed-by only to the x86 patches, > or patch 01 (rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call) > as well ? This one of course. I've certainly not yet reviewed your next version :)