From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755279AbdL2K6p (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2017 05:58:45 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:33768 "EHLO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753861AbdL2K6o (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2017 05:58:44 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,475,1508796000"; d="scan'208";a="307139295" Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 11:58:42 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: perf: documentation for cycles_no_execute event Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Many of the x86 pipeline.json files have the brief description "Total execution stalls" for both CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_NO_EXECUTE and CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_TOTAL. Should the case for CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_NO_EXECUTE have a brief description that mentions cycles? Some of the files do have a public description that mentions cycles, eg broadwellde/pipeline.json has "Counts number of cycles nothing is executed on any execution port.", but others (eg ivytown/pipeline.json) just have "Total execution stalls." twice. Maybe "Cycles where nothing is executed" would be ok for CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_NO_EXECUTE? thanks, julia