From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
Cc: "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
"vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com" <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"eranian@google.com" <eranian@google.com>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"davidcc@google.com" <davidcc@google.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"1733662@bugs.launchpad.net" <1733662@bugs.launchpad.net>,
"Roderick W. Smith" <rod.smith@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][v4.14.y][v4.15] x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Improve limbo list processing
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 19:09:33 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801161909020.2366@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2f4652e-1eee-a1ca-d5f7-640552fc3594@canonical.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1728 bytes --]
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> On 01/16/2018 08:32 AM, Shankar, Ravi V wrote:
> > Vikas on vacation until end of the month. Fenghua will look into this
> > issue.
> >
> > On Jan 16, 2018, at 5:09 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de
> > <mailto:tglx@linutronix.de>> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Vikas, Fenghua can you please look at that ASAP?
> >>
> >> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Vikas,
> >>>>
> >>>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
> >>>> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved
> >>>> this bug:
> >>>>
> >>>> commit 24247aeeabe99eab13b798ccccc2dec066dd6f07
> >>>> Author: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
> >>>> <mailto:vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>>
> >>>> Date: Tue Aug 15 18:00:43 2017 -0700
> >>>>
> >>>> x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Improve limbo list processing
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The regression was introduced as of v4.14-r1 and still exists with
> >>>> current mainline. The trace with v4.15-rc7 is in comment #44[1].
> >>>>
> >>>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
> >>>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
> >>>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
> >>>
> >>> That stinks like a use after free. Can you run with KASAN enabled?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> tglx
>
>
> Here is some data wiht KASAN enabled:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1733662/comments/51
>
> Are there any specific logs you would like to see, or specific actions
> executed?
No, the KASAN output is pretty clear where the issue is.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-12 16:22 Joseph Salisbury
2018-01-14 11:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-16 13:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <159B72D0-06FE-4925-A11A-1F8A7741BF70@intel.com>
2018-01-16 16:40 ` Joseph Salisbury
2018-01-16 18:09 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-01-16 18:34 ` Yu, Fenghua
2018-01-16 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 11:00 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Prevent use after free tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 20:35 ` [REGRESSION][v4.14.y][v4.15] x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Improve limbo list processing Joseph Salisbury
2018-01-17 22:16 ` Joseph Salisbury
2018-01-17 22:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 22:59 ` Joseph Salisbury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1801161909020.2366@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=1733662@bugs.launchpad.net \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=rod.smith@canonical.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®