From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>,
maged michael <maged.michael@gmail.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
"Russell King, ARM Linux" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, David Sehr <sehr@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 4.16 04/10] membarrier: provide SHARED_EXPEDITED command (v2)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 20:04:18 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801162003070.2366@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1577189631.3966.1516129345161.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On Jan 16, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
> > And I really have to ask whether this should be named _GLOBAL_ instead of
> > _SHARED_.
> >
> > Hmm?
>
> I agree with you that this behavior fits better a "global" definition
> than a "shared" one, especially given that it does not target a specific
> shared memory mapping. The main issue I have is due to the pre-existing
> MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED introduced in Linux 4.3. That one should also have
> been called "MEMBARRIER_CMD_GLOBAL" based on the current line of thoughts.
>
> Do you envision a way to transition forward to a new "MEMBARRIER_CMD_GLOBAL" for
> the currently existing MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED ?
>
> Perhaps with a duplicated enum entry ?
>
> enum membarrier_cmd {
> MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY = 0,
> MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED = (1 << 0), /* use MEMBARRIER_CMD_GLOBAL instead */
> MEMBARRIER_CMD_GLOBAL = (1 << 0),
That should work. Though I doubt that you ever can get rid of CMD_SHARED,
but at least the code is clearer that way.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-15 19:10 [PATCH for 4.16 00/10] membarrier updates for 4.16 Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-15 19:10 ` [PATCH for 4.16 01/10] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd (v2) Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-15 19:10 ` [PATCH for 4.16 02/10] powerpc: membarrier: Skip memory barrier in switch_mm() (v7) Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-15 19:10 ` [PATCH for 4.16 03/10] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements (v5) Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-15 19:10 ` [PATCH for 4.16 04/10] membarrier: provide SHARED_EXPEDITED command (v2) Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-16 18:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-16 19:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-16 19:04 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-01-15 19:10 ` [PATCH for 4.16 05/10] membarrier: selftest: Test shared expedited cmd Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-15 19:11 ` [PATCH for 4.16 06/10] membarrier: Provide core serializing command Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-15 19:11 ` [PATCH for 4.16 07/10] x86: Introduce sync_core_before_usermode (v2) Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-16 18:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-15 19:11 ` [PATCH for 4.16 08/10] membarrier: x86: Provide core serializing command (v3) Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-16 18:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-16 19:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-16 20:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-15 19:11 ` [PATCH for 4.16 09/10] membarrier: arm64: Provide core serializing command Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-01-15 19:11 ` [PATCH for 4.16 10/10] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited sync core cmd Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1801162003070.2366@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ahh@google.com \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
--cc=ghackmann@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=maged.michael@gmail.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sehr@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®