From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 4.15-rc7] IRQ matrix management errors
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:32:12 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801171030150.1777@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801171020440.1777@nanos>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:34:22AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Can you trace the matrix allocations from the very beginning or tell me how
> > > to reproduce. I'd like to figure out why this is happening.
> >
> > Sure, I'll get the irq_matrix events.
> >
> > I reproduce this on a machine with 112 CPUs and 3 NVMe controllers. The
> > first two NVMe want 112 MSI-x vectors, and the last only 31 vectors. The
> > test runs 'modprobe nvme' and 'modprobe -r nvme' in a loop with 10
> > second delay between each step. Repro occurs within a few iterations,
> > sometimes already broken after the initial boot.
>
> That doesn't sound right. The vectors should be spread evenly accross the
> CPUs. So ENOSPC should never happen.
>
> Can you please take snapshots of /sys/kernel/debug/irq/ between the
> modprobe and modprobe -r steps?
The allocation fails because CPU1 has exhausted it's vector space here:
[002] d... 333.028216: irq_matrix_alloc_managed: bit=34 cpu=1 online=1 avl=0 alloc=202 managed=2 online_maps=112 global_avl=22085, global_rsvd=158, total_alloc=460
Now the interesting question is how that happens.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180115025759.GG13580@localhost.localdomain>
2018-01-15 3:02 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-15 9:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-16 6:16 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-16 7:11 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-16 10:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-16 11:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-16 14:26 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-17 2:25 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-17 7:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 7:55 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-17 9:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 9:32 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-01-17 14:24 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-17 15:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-18 2:37 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-18 8:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-18 8:48 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-18 9:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-18 10:43 ` [tip:irq/urgent] irq/matrix: Spread interrupts on allocation tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 11:15 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/apic/vector: Fix off by one in error path tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1801171030150.1777@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®