mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, neeraju@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] timer: Forward timer base before migrating timers
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:45:42 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801181141200.1847@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117124442.24904-1-clingutla@codeaurora.org>

On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Lingutla Chandrasekhar wrote:

> In case when timers are migrated to a CPU, after it exits
> idle, but before timer base is forwarded, either from
> run_timer_softirq()/mod_timer()/add_timer_on(), it's
> possible that migrated timers are queued, based on older
> clock value. This can cause delays in handling those timers.
> 
> For example, consider below sequence of events:
> 
> - CPU0 timer1 expires = 59969 and base->clk = 59131. So,
>   timer is queued at level 2, with next expiry for this timer
>   = 60032 (due to granularity addition).
> - CPU1 enters idle @60007, with next timer expiry @60020.
> - CPU1 exits idle.
> - CPU0 is hotplugged at 60009, and timers are migrated to
>   CPU1, with new base->clk = 60007. timer1 is queued,
>   based on 60007 at level 0, for immediate handling (in
>   next timer softirq handling).
> - CPU1's base->clk is forwarded to 60009, so, in next sched
>   timer interrupt, timer1 is not handled.
> 
> The issue happens as timer wheel collects expired timers
> starting from the current clk's index onwards, but migrated
> timers, if enqueued, based on older clk value can result
> in their index being less than clk's current index.
> This can only happen if new base->clk is ahead of
> timer->expires, resulting in timer being queued at
> new base->clk's current index.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>

That's still wrong.

The SOB chain should be:

    SOB:  Author
    SOB:  Handler/Transporter
    SOB:  Committer

So if you wrote te patch then Neeraj's SOB is wrong. If Neeraj wrote the
patch then the patch should contain a

From: Neeraj

line right at the top of the changelog.

If you both developed the patch then please use;

   Co-developed-by: Neeraj
   Signed-off-by:   Neeraj
   Signed-off-by;   You

That would make you the Author in the git commit, but still preserve the
co-authorship.

Please clarify what applies to this particular patch.

Thanks,

	tglx

      reply	other threads:[~2018-01-18 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-17 12:44 Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2018-01-18 10:45 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1801181141200.1847@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=clingutla@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®