From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933643AbeAXMvI (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:51:08 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:60477 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933386AbeAXMvH (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:51:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:50:52 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Lyude Paul cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , keith.busch@intel.com, Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: "irq/matrix: Spread interrupts on allocation" breaks nouveau in mainline kernel In-Reply-To: <1516744873.29151.3.camel@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1516744873.29151.3.camel@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Lyude Paul wrote: > Hi! Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this patch actually seems to break > suspending and resuming with nouveau on my machine: > [ 31.003578] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11523 at kernel/smp.c:291 > smp_call_function_single+0xdc/0xe0 This warning has absolutely no relationship to that patch. > [ 31.003592] RIP: 0010:smp_call_function_single+0xdc/0xe0 > [ 31.003603] ? rdmsr_safe_on_cpu+0x4b/0x70 > [ 31.003604] rdmsr_safe_on_cpu+0x4b/0x70 > [ 31.003606] get_block_address.isra.0+0x6e/0xe0 > [ 31.003607] mce_amd_feature_init+0x63/0x2c0 > [ 31.003609] mce_syscore_resume+0x1e/0x30 > [ 31.003611] syscore_resume+0x4b/0x170 > [ 31.003613] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x608/0x7e0 > [ 31.003614] pm_suspend+0x315/0x380 > [ 31.003615] state_store+0x7d/0xe0 > [ 31.003618] kernfs_fop_write+0xfa/0x180 > [ 31.003620] __vfs_write+0x23/0x130 > [ 31.003623] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x29/0x40 > [ 31.003625] ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x40 > [ 31.003626] vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0 > [ 31.003627] SyS_write+0x42/0x90 > [ 31.003629] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x24/0x87 Borislav? Thanks, tglx