From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] Timer core updates for 4.16
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:25:31 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801301924370.1797@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxzm6fY396+Nh3mZm5BroW4ZQmh3gj0YLvg7nKs5qzQKg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > These are in cases significant driver simplifications, but they also enable the
> > real deal, the elimination of the hrtimer tasklet:
> >
> > softirq: Remove tasklet_hrtimer
> >
> > include/linux/interrupt.h | 25 -----------------------
> > kernel/softirq.c | 51 -----------------------------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 76 deletions(-)
> >
> > ... which is a pretty nice thing in itself even without the driver
> > simplifications!
> >
> > Plus the _real_ secret motivation behind it all is the -rt kernel and
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y and the ability to push most of the hrtimer processing into
> > softirq context - while it still keeps the main hrtimer machinery capable to run
> > in hard-RT hardirq domain. Turns out it was possible to implement this duality via
> > the softirq-hrtimers, with a good chunk of benefits to non-rt upstream as well.
>
> So this is the kind of explanation that I would have liked in the
> "please pull" (and that would have been great in the merge message).
> Explaining not just the "what", but very much the "why".
>
> Anyway, it's obviously pulled regardless, and I'm just pointing this
> out for "maybe next time".
Sorry about that. I usually try to be descriptive and will do so next time
again.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-29 8:48 Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-30 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-30 6:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-30 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-30 18:25 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-01-31 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1801301924370.1797@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®