From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932629AbeCOWlk (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:41:40 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:54634 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932522AbeCOWlj (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:41:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:41:36 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jason Vas Dias cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, andi@firstfloor.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.16-rc5 (3)] x86/vdso: on Intel, VDSO should handle CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1521129648-20889-1-git-send-email-jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Jason Vas Dias wrote: > On 15/03/2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, jason.vas.dias@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> Resent to address reviewer comments. > > > > I was being patient so far and tried to guide you through the patch > > submission process, but unfortunately this turns out to be just waste of my > > time. > > > > You have not addressed any of the comments I made here: > > > > [1] > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1803141511340.2481@nanos.tec.linutronix.de > > [2] > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1803141527300.2481@nanos.tec.linutronix.de > > > > I'm really sorry about that - I did not see those mails , > and have searched for them in my inbox - That's close to the 'my dog ate the homework' excuse. Of course they were sent to the list and to you personally as I used reply-all. From the mail server log: 2018-03-14 15:27:27 1ew7NH-00039q-Hv <= tglx@linutronix.de id=alpine.DEB.2.21.1803141511340.2481@nanos.tec.linutronix.de 2018-03-14 15:27:30 1ew7NH-00039q-Hv => jason.vas.dias@gmail.com R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [2a00:1450:4013:c01::1a] X=TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128 DN="C=US,ST=California,L=Mountain View,O=Google Inc,CN=mx.google.com" 2018-03-14 15:27:31 1ew7NH-00039q-Hv => linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67] 2018-03-14 15:27:47 1ew7NH-00039q-Hv Completed If those messages would not have been delivered to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org they would hardly be on the mailing list archive, right? And they both got delivered to your gmail account as well. > are you sure they were sent to 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org' ? > That is the only list I am subscribed to . > I clicked on the links , but the 'To:' field is just > 'linux-kernel' . There is no 'To' field on that page. [prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] List: linux-kernel List != To. As any other sane archive it strips the To and Cc fields for obvious reasons. > If I had seen those messages before I re-submitted, > those issues would have been fixed. > > checkpatch.pl did not report them - > I ran it with all patches and it reported > no errors . patch 1/3: ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s) total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 119 lines checked patch 2/3: ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s) total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 71 lines checked patch 3/3: WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files #24: FILE: arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c:31: +extern unsigned int __vdso_tsc_calibration( WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? #93: new file mode 100644 ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s) total: 1 errors, 2 warnings, 143 lines checked It reports an error for every single patch of your latest submission. > And I did send the test results in a previous mail - In private mail which I ignore if there is no real good reason. And just for the record. This private mail contains the following headers: In-Reply-To: References: <1521001222-10712-1-git-send-email-jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> <1521001222-10712-3-git-send-email-jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> From: Jason Vas Dias Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:08:55 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.16-rc5 2/3] x86/vdso: on Intel, VDSO should handle CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW So now, if you take the message ID which is in the In-Reply-To: field and compare it to the message ID which I used for link [2]: In-Reply-To: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1803141527300.2481@nanos.tec.linutronix.de you might notice that these are identical. So how did you end up replying to a mail which you never received? Nice try. I'm really fed up with this. Thanks, tglx