From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752199AbeEQQCP (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2018 12:02:15 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f196.google.com ([209.85.216.196]:33999 "EHLO mail-qt0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751047AbeEQQCN (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2018 12:02:13 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpMYfyrrAjgiU4pJKhTB6oim+FOfvdIhIctDk+Gn9MMpbouE0UPZAFf1rx+fHwLKtD+tE94tQ== From: Vince Weaver X-Google-Original-From: Vince Weaver Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 12:02:08 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: vince@macbook-air To: Eric Anholt cc: Florian Fainelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: bcm2835: Add the PMU to the devicetree. In-Reply-To: <87efia1hjg.fsf@anholt.net> Message-ID: References: <20180517131727.29263-1-eric@anholt.net> <87efia1hjg.fsf@anholt.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote: > > Is that better than a53? I'm happy to switch to that. The important > part to me is the a7, since basically everyone with this hw is running > arm32. no, on further investigation it looks like a53 is more proper to use than the generic armv8. Is the armv8 pmu on the cortex-a53 backwards compatible with armv7? I'm dreading having to pull up the various ARM ARMs to look for myself so if it works for you I'm fine with that part too. The biggest pushback I had with my original patch was no one believing irq 9 was the right one to use. Vince