From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD6CC3A5A0 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB78E20843 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727611AbfHSNOB (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:14:01 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:47119 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727391AbfHSNOB (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:14:01 -0400 Received: from [5.158.153.52] (helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hzhTy-0004Bx-LY; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:13:58 +0200 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:13:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ming Lei cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Jon Derrick , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] genirq/affinity: Spread vectors on node according to nr_cpu ratio In-Reply-To: <20190819124937.9948-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20190819124937.9948-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20190819124937.9948-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Ming Lei wrote: > Cc: Jon Derrick > Cc: Jens Axboe > Reported-by: Jon Derrick > Reviewed-by: Jon Derrick > Reviewed-by: Keith Busch This version is sufficiently different from the previous one, so I do not consider the reviewed-by tags still being valid and meaningful. Don't include them unless you just do cosmetic changes. Thanks tglx