From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0686C3A589 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF3D2054F for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729937AbfHTNIi (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:08:38 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:51937 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728595AbfHTNIi (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:08:38 -0400 Received: from p5de0b6c5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.182.197] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1i03sJ-0005st-Qj; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:08:36 +0200 Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:08:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Christoph Hellwig cc: LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , John Stultz , Frederic Weisbecker , Anna-Maria Behnsen Subject: Re: [patch 03/44] posix-timer: Use a callback for cancel synchronization In-Reply-To: <20190820022109.GB9594@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <20190819143141.221906747@linutronix.de> <20190819143801.656864506@linutronix.de> <20190820022109.GB9594@infradead.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > + if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(kc->timer_wait_running)) > > + kc->timer_wait_running(timer); > > This looks weird. The only place calling yor new method only does so > after checking that it is not set and actually warns if it set? Yeah, that wants to be; if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!kc->timer_wait_running)) kc->timer_wait_running(timer);