From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF18C34045 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8026E2465A for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726663AbgBRQQw (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:16:52 -0500 Received: from gentwo.org ([3.19.106.255]:41626 "EHLO gentwo.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726402AbgBRQQw (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:16:52 -0500 Received: by gentwo.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 277453E998; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gentwo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2664D3E997; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:16:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@www.lameter.com To: "Tobin C. Harding" cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] slabinfo: parse all NUMA attributes In-Reply-To: <20200217084828.9092-1-tobin@kernel.org> Message-ID: References: <20200217084828.9092-1-tobin@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > I found a few files in /sys/kernel/slab/foo/ that contain NUMA info that > is not currently being parsed by `slabinfo.c`. I do not know whether > this is intentional or not? Since I did not know this I just printed > the info in the NUMA report section like is done for the per node slabs > and partial slabs info. > > Just for your interest; I found these while re-writing slabinfo in Rust, > thanks to the type-system. I guess that if they were unintentionally > missed then this is a small win, if they were intentionally missed then > this series is just noise :) It was just to make the display simpler and I did not get around to the full implementation (by adding some sort of NUMA option) since other things kept coming up.