mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@oth-regensburg.de>
Subject: MAINTAINERS: Marking internal distribution lists
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:37:54 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2009110811520.9220@felia> (raw)

Hi Joe,

in my continued effort to clean up MAINTAINERS, I came across various 
email "lists" that are actually just some kind of internal distribution
lists, but we cannot subscribe to them (no archives available) and they 
are not affiliated to a specific person.

Some examples are:

  - bcm-kernel-feedback-list.broadcom.com
  - brcm80211-dev-list.cypress.com
  - brcm80211-dev-list.pdl.broadcom.com
  - coreteam.netfilter.org
  - esc.storagedev.microsemi.com
  - linux-imx.nxp.com
  - megaraidlinux.pdl.broadcom.com
  - MPT-FusionLinux.pdl.broadcom.com
  - ocfs2-devel.oss.oracle.com
  - oss-drivers.netronome.com
  - patches.opensource.cirrus.com
  - qat-linux.intel.com
  - rds-devel.oss.oracle.com
  - sparmaintainer.unisys.com
  - wil6210.qti.qualcomm.com
  - x86.kernel.org

One of the dots needs to be replaced by an @, of course, but let us not 
make it too easy for spammers to pick something up ;)

Some of them are mentioned in MAINTAINERS with 'L:' entry as those above, 
some others are mentioned in MAINTAINERS with an 'R:' or even a 'M:' entry.

Greg KH also called them email group aliases and does not want them to be 
valid entries for maintainer roles ('M:') because it is unclear who really 
is the maintainer for such sections (when is it orphaned, when does the 
maintainer actually change, etc.).

Would you have any recommendation for marking/handling such email 
addresses in MAINTAINERS?

I thought about the following options:

If the email address cannot be affiliated to one specific person and the 
list is not subscribable,

  A. should we then mark them as 'L: email (internal)'? (or 
     some other keyword, such as non-subscribable, restricted group...)
 
  B. should we just make them 'R:' entries?

With a bit of searching and guessing, I can probably update all those 
entries in MAINTAINERS and pass them to the according mailing lists for 
review and inclusion.


Best regards,

Lukas

             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-11  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-11  6:37 Lukas Bulwahn [this message]
2020-09-11  9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-11 10:12   ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-11 14:40   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-09-11 10:16 ` Joe Perches
2020-09-11 10:23   ` Lukas Bulwahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2009110811520.9220@felia \
    --to=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf.ramsauer@oth-regensburg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®