From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC45EC433FF for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B29F20663 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="XgpQDDJM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727582AbfHMQwA (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:52:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:43219 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726810AbfHMQv7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:51:59 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id e12so30842531otp.10 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:51:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=uC6dDZKAip16b+mn3qV8AFtyarHS2Wtjrk4sIs9wXF4=; b=XgpQDDJMv+/ruzPLaeBUwtQGSgQA4L3nxrBQ917gPpnuR6cUFXgim3kBcEa/w5jutY 1I9/+H2KPKPtxKPxy/8FlBxrLF+MmPmdZbuhYc8EDkrwdyqA6hVQoM95f8HcbpUpb1Qx hZTvovsZfKBhDBxViQTvA8wfBcIFktwAJqiyuK92QW91ND+gAjrkFS95swU6Mb77+JJT dWsfs+8qZJV00w+zYAJRBgLNShd42ftbjk5b5cCzZ2Wio/qFC7MchhHVkiLc0/4EM54U 4yszi7PJ41btEdlzVWQp+FYSYj7QgFW35VAqKh4gbuBkIL4TFcY3xDlkKtl0imc5VzCp WJbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=uC6dDZKAip16b+mn3qV8AFtyarHS2Wtjrk4sIs9wXF4=; b=GbdmvphzU0HQbRaYHNTRx6YSdGUx+WIdGkO7Ls5zuWx8LezM98F3DTekgWeEtwG/u9 KOs5HYI+6Xh+ktu9W2FfXdh4CNwNfnDfkY3CXcgxdkVP+PcZWdH99kwXi+UQYofMAfnk 9u4m+ljcx2aWn/b3tC/V/4FNnicn5NKizRjKGA2JxaK3ujtvl+TGDj9dIz06QMJBb7Iw Q4FijvvLlAMhJm6uauVJfUi0wZfWTq+lJd0OBHVJq7FXCjuPjZVtHoFhb5fdFxvHBfzI awwtqI1CYrxKoNdv1R6SfusNnMIPziyTwlZt3PNOw3E6W6XrlTThSVAwksLkRatFW87O +C5A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPrEG2b/CZgV0oFFLbeowScms6T3sqWhMmtwU3XsfkK/5yzRUt oZN7cQdDghwUdNXkGq84Ix9UxCPmNyQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPHBJM6jvKxBo1VW6csfTWhlFi+l+kj3B6joswy7ZnX59kuzbPWX+o7X/YHb6OhVNwnoh/Yw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9747:: with SMTP id c7mr8146194ioo.244.1565715118854; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-73-95-159-87.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.95.159.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e26sm85862802iod.10.2019.08.13.09.51.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:51:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Damien Le Moal , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atish Patra Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] riscv: use CSR_SATP instead of the legacy sptbr name in switch_mm In-Reply-To: <20190813164257.GA10019@lst.de> Message-ID: References: <20190813154747.24256-1-hch@lst.de> <20190813154747.24256-3-hch@lst.de> <20190813164257.GA10019@lst.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 09:36:23AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > Switch to our own constant for the satp register instead of using > > > the old name from a legacy version of the privileged spec. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra > > > > Didn't you want us to replace this with Bin Meng's patch? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20190807151316.GB16432@infradead.org/ > > > > If so, probably best just to drop this one and state a dependency. > > Either way is fine with me. But until you have a branch with > either one applied I'm going to keep resending my patch, as random > dependencies on uncommitted patches don't work. If you're going to resend a patch, it's better to resend the other one that you've explicitly endorsed in favor of your own. - Paul