Re: SD_LOAD_BALANCE

[Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>]

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Vincent Guittot wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 12:34, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > > Would it be useful to always check whether prev is idle, perhaps in
> > > > wake_affine_idle or perhaps in select_idle_sibling?
> > >
> > > Yes, that would make sense to add a condition in  wake_affine_idle to
> > > return prev if this cpu is not idle (or about to become idle)
> >
> > The case where this cpu is idle would be in the interrupt case.  If both
> > prev cpu and this cpu are idle, is it more desirable to move the thread to
> > this cpu or to leave it where it was?
>
> I think that we should keep the current behavior regarding this cpu
> and the shared cache case and add one more test before the last return
> of the function.
>
> right now, we select this_cpu:
> -if this cpu is idle,  it shares cache with prev and previous is not idle.
> -if it's a sync wake up because we expect the task to use local data
> of the current running task on this cpu.
>
> Then we add a new case to return prev cpu if it is idle which is your case

OK, sounds good, thanks.

julia