From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C9AC433ED for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 14:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D278461002 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 14:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234779AbhDJOCI (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:02:08 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:43482 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234548AbhDJOCH (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:02:07 -0400 IronPort-HdrOrdr: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3Ar6mAq67lpGrAOLVITwPXwCnXdLJzesId70hD?= =?us-ascii?q?6mlaTxtJfsuE0/2/hfhz726RtB89UGwt8OrqBICuWnXZnKQe3aAwOvOYUBDiqC?= =?us-ascii?q?+UKuhZjLfK5x3FN2nA+vVG1aFmGpIObeHYKVRhl8717E2ZPr8boOWvy6yjiefA?= =?us-ascii?q?w3oFd2gDV4ha4wh0EQqdGEFtLTM2ZqYRLoaW5cZMulObF0g/U8LTPBU4dtTYq8?= =?us-ascii?q?aOvJzrZgNuPW9E1CC+yQLt0rL8HhSCty1ybxpEy94ZnlT4rw=3D=3D?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,212,1613430000"; d="scan'208";a="378288243" Received: from 173.121.68.85.rev.sfr.net (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.121.173]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2021 16:01:51 +0200 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" cc: Julia Lawall , Greg KH , outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Change the type and use of a variable In-Reply-To: <3114102.qbl0ZuBMXl@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20210410092232.15155-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> <2186059.xkuF2sVEJi@localhost.localdomain> <3114102.qbl0ZuBMXl@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > On Saturday, April 10, 2021 3:24:43 PM CEST Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 10, 2021 2:12:28 PM CEST Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > > > > > On Saturday, April 10, 2021 1:37:30 PM CEST Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > > That variable has global scope and is assigned at least in: > > > > > > What do you mean by global scope? None of the following look > > > > > > like > > > > > > references to global variables. > > > > > > > > > > > > julia > > > > > > > > > > I just mean that fw_current_in_ps_mode is a field of a struct in a > > > > > .h > > > > > file included everywhere in this driver and that the functions whom > > > > > the following assignments belong to have not the "static" type > > > > > modifier. > > > > > > > > OK, but a field in a structure is not a variable, and this is not > > > > what > > > > scope means. > > > > > > You're right, a field in a structure is not a variable. > > > > > > > int x; > > > > > > > > outside of anything is a global variable (global scope). > > > > > > > > int foo() { > > > > > > > > int x; > > > > ... > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > Here x is a local variable. Its scope is the body of the function. > > > > > > > > int foo() { > > > > > > > > if (abc) { > > > > > > > > int x; > > > > ... > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > Here x is a local variable, but its scope is only in the if branch. > > > > > > And you're right again: I needed a little refresh of my knowledge of C. > > > > > > I've searched again in the code for the purpose of finding out if that > > > struct is initialized with global scope but I didn't find anything. I > > > didn't even find any dynamic allocation within functions that returns > > > pointers to that struct. > > > > > > Therefore, according to Greg's request, I'll delete that stupid 'if' > > > statement in the patch series v2 that I'm about to submit. > > > > I'm really not clear on why the if should be deleted. > > > > julia > > > I'm supposed to delete it because of the review made by Greg. In a couple > of previous messages he wrote: > > "If this is only checked, how can it ever be true? Who ever sets this > value?" > > and then: > > "Just delete the variable from the structure entirely and when it is > used.". > > However, like you, I'm not sure yet. Be sure. Greg already said that he misinterpreted the patch, because he thought that the name also changed. julia > > Thanks, > > Fabio > > > > > I've really appreciated your help. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Fabio > > > > > > > julia > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Fabio > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c:368: > > > > > > > pwrpriv->fw_current_in_ps_mode = false; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c:380: > > > > > > > pwrpriv->fw_current_in_ps_mode = true; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_hal_init.c:433: > > > > > > > adapter_to_pwrctl(padapter)->fw_current_in_ps_mode = false; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c:981: > > > > > > > pwrctrlpriv->fw_current_in_ps_mode = false; > > > > >