From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030890AbXD2Ru5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:50:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030876AbXD2Ru5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:50:57 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:40349 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030878AbXD2Ru4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:50:56 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:50:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Andi Kleen cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Adrian Bunk , Diego Calleja , Chuck Ebbert , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 In-Reply-To: <20070429173725.GB30248@one.firstfloor.org> Message-ID: References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> <200704291849.23197.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070429173725.GB30248@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Besides the primary point of bug tracking is not to be friendly > to someone, but to (a) fix the bugs and (b) know how many bugs > there for a given release. Any replacement would need to solve > this problem too. > > Email does not solve it as far as I can see. Email fixes a _lot_ more bugs than bugzilla does. End of story. I don't think anybody who cannot accept that UNDENIABLE FACT should even participate in this discussion. Wake up and look at all the bugs we fix - most of them have never been in bugzilla. That's a FACT. Don't go around ignoring reality. Linus