From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759631AbXEJU6T (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 16:58:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755323AbXEJU6L (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 16:58:11 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:42594 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754429AbXEJU6J (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 16:58:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:56:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Len Brown cc: Andrew Morton , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.22 - part 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200705100411.32349.lenb@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 May 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Seems to work for me. My evo correctly started the fan, and stopped it > when the temperature went down again. Looking at things in "top", I do end up occasionally seeing spikes where kacpid takes 17% of CPU time, and kacpi_notify takes a few percent too. But the machine works ok, and it doesn't seem to be horrible: 64 ? S< 0:15 [kacpid] 65 ? S< 0:08 [kacpi_notify] so they've gotten 23 seconds of CPU time over the 37 minutes that laptop has been up now. That's arguably too much, but on the other hand, I did end up trying to stress it out by doing some 3D stuff while compiling the kernel and doing "git grep" over the kernel tree etc. Linus