mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] ufd v1 - use unsequential O(1) fdmap
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:11:28 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706032210040.23741@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706031311490.13247@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>



On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> 
> Agreed, a new syscall looks less messy. I'll make sys_dup2() to allow 
> installing in the non-sequential area, only if there's an fd already 
> allocated. F_DUPFD will remain unchanged (that is, not allow 
> non-sequential fds allocations).

I actually think that a new system call is _hugely_ messy. It means that 
anybody who wants to use a new feature needs to have a new glibc. Not 
nice, not nice at all. I'd much rather see a totally transparent extension 
that doesn't require any new user space what-so-ever to be used...

		Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-04  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-02 22:59 Davide Libenzi
2007-06-03  6:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-03 18:22   ` Davide Libenzi
2007-06-03 18:20 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-06-03 18:53   ` Davide Libenzi
2007-06-03 19:43     ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-06-03 20:19       ` Davide Libenzi
2007-06-03 20:46         ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-06-03 23:01           ` Davide Libenzi
2007-06-03 23:09             ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-06-03 23:32               ` Davide Libenzi
2007-06-04  5:11         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2007-06-04  5:22           ` Ulrich Drepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.98.0706032210040.23741@woody.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®