From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761148AbXGCVnF (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:43:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758971AbXGCVmy (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:42:54 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:41338 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752912AbXGCVmx (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:42:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:42:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Bj?rn Steinbrink cc: Michal Piotrowski , Andrew Morton , LKML , Andi Kleen , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches In-Reply-To: <20070703213614.GA29175@atjola.homenet> Message-ID: References: <468A7D24.3040004@googlemail.com> <20070703213614.GA29175@atjola.homenet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote: > On 2007.07.03 18:45:24 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Subject : OProfile issues > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/12/207 > > Submitter : Stephane Eranian > > Handled-By : Björn Steinbrink > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/12/392 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/20/275 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/20/276 > > Status : patches were suggested > > Andi said that one of the regression fixes wasn't critical for .22 and > that he wants to do a stopgap for the other regression (my patch > sucked), reverting the code to the .21 version. So you can drop the > patches and/or me here. Can you say which patch should be reverted. This thing really shouldn't have gone on this long, I would have hopef we had the oprofile thing sorted out already.. Linus