From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935639AbXGRArA (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:47:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758969AbXGRAqv (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:46:51 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:60461 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758921AbXGRAqu (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:46:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:46:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Michal Piotrowski cc: James Morris , Stephen Smalley , Paul Moore , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] SELinux Netlabel updates In-Reply-To: <469D6135.4000301@googlemail.com> Message-ID: References: <469D6135.4000301@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Once again I tested both patches, build log shows only this You clearly didn't test them with CONFIG_NETLABEL set to off, or you have a buggy compiler. You had int netlbl_enabled(void) { return 0; } in a header file. Now think for a moment what happens when that header file gets included multiple times from different C files? Linus