From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S939397AbXGTBn6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:43:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750715AbXGTBnu (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:43:50 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:58032 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760057AbXGTBnt (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:43:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:43:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Paul Mundt cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mm: Remove slab destructors from kmem_cache_create(). In-Reply-To: <20070720012846.GA22487@linux-sh.org> Message-ID: References: <20070720012846.GA22487@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Paul Mundt wrote: > > Perhaps this is something that should go in later, as it does > cause a bit of churn across the tree. However, there shouldn't be > anything here that causes trouble for git merges, as it's all pretty > straightforward removal. I've placed it in a git tree to pull as it's > quite large, and not terribly interesting. Ok, I thought twice about this, but (a) I think most of the merging for 2.6.23 has been done (b) there's really no point in holding on to that thing (c) the patch looked beatiful in colorized version in gitk so I decided I might as well just merge it. Looks fine to me, and there really is no point holding on to an interface that we've never really used, and that we don't even support any more. Linus