From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] compacting file_ra_state
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:13:34 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707202312260.27249@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070721055706.GA5097@one.firstfloor.org>
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Haven't the readahead patches already essentially been in -mm* for some time?
They have indeed, and I merged them this week.
> I thought the new patches were some some restructured code, but
> essentially the tested algorithms?
No, this series is a further cleanup on top of the restructured code, with
some new features too. The series _looks_ fine to me, but it still makes
sense to go through -mm, I think.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-21 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070721035733.951838089@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 3:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] readahead cleanups and interleaved readahead take 2 Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070721035850.977231489@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 3:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] compacting file_ra_state Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070721040644.GA9750@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 4:06 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-21 4:27 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <20070721042939.GA28875@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 4:29 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-21 5:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-21 6:03 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-21 6:13 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2007-07-21 6:17 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <20070721035851.185553787@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 3:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] mmap read-around simplification Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070721035851.321030363@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 3:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] combine file_ra_state.prev_index/prev_offset into prev_pos Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070721035851.461364420@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 3:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] trivial filemap.c cleanups Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070721035851.638623804@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 3:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] remove several readahead macros Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070721035851.791763729@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 3:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] remove the limit max_sectors_kb imposed on max_readahead_kb Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070721035851.946351617@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 3:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] introduce radix_tree_scan_hole() Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070721035852.104255316@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-07-21 3:57 ` [PATCH 8/8] basic support of interleaved reads Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.999.0707202312260.27249@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®