From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] type safe allocator
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:07:47 +0530 (IST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708021302500.8258@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1IGAAI-0006K6-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Hi Miklos,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> I wonder why we don't have type safe object allocators a-la new() in
> C++ or g_new() in glib?
>
> fooptr = k_new(struct foo, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> is nicer and more descriptive than
>
> fooptr = kmalloc(sizeof(*fooptr), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> and more safe than
>
> fooptr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> And we have zillions of both variants.
>
> Note, I'm not advocating mass replacement, but using this in new code,
> and gradually converting old ones whenever they need touching anyway.
> [...]
>
> +/**
> + * k_new - allocate given type object
> + * @type: the type of the object to allocate
> + * @flags: the type of memory to allocate.
> + */
> +#define k_new(type, flags) ((type *) kmalloc(sizeof(type), flags))
What others already said, plus:
kmalloc()'ing sizeof(struct foo) is not always what we want in C either.
Several kernel structs have zero-length / variable-length array members
and space must be allocated for them only at alloc() time ... would be
impossible to make them work with this scheme.
Satyam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-02 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-01 9:06 Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-01 9:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-01 9:41 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-01 10:44 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-01 9:57 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-01 11:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-01 10:45 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-01 11:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-01 11:56 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 3:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-02 7:27 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 12:05 ` Al Viro
2007-08-02 13:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-02 5:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-02 7:38 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-02 7:37 ` Satyam Sharma [this message]
2007-08-02 7:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 11:31 ` [PATCH] " Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 12:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-08-02 12:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-02 13:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 13:35 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-02 13:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-02 14:06 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2007-08-02 14:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-02 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-02 18:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.999.0708021302500.8258@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in \
--to=satyam@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®