From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762054AbXIUSzZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:55:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754375AbXIUSzN (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:55:13 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:58652 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752802AbXIUSzL (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:55:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:55:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Christoph Lameter cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, asit.k.mallick@intel.com Subject: Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and page table pages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070921180742.GH20863@linux-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > The quicklists collect pages while we gather pages for TLB flushing. > These pages must be kept until the actual TLB flush has occurred. The > optimization of releasing off node pages early is therefore not valid. That should be the "mmu_gather" structure, not the quicklists. Linus