From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763594AbXJZSHk (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:07:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761107AbXJZSHY (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:07:24 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:55788 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758788AbXJZSHW (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:07:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: "Eric W. Biederman" cc: Andrew Morton , Al Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Linux Containers Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Fix proc_kill_inodes to kill dentries on all proc superblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > It appears we overlooked support for removing generic proc files > when we added support for multiple proc super blocks. Handle > that now. There seems to be more users of "proc_mnt" out there. proc_flush_task, anyone? Linus