From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755260AbXKEWmu (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:42:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752782AbXKEWmm (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:42:42 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:51942 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752700AbXKEWml (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:42:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 14:42:15 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Greg KH cc: davem@davemloft.net, jgarzik@redhat.com, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] PCI patches for 2.6.24-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20071105222846.GA32090@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20071105215601.GA4612@kroah.com> <20071105222846.GA32090@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Greg KH wrote: > > I'm guessing that David is referring to a commit in his tree, not in > yours yet. Well, I suspect that David referred to a commit that he just sent by email. Which obviously will have a *different* commit ID once you commit it - so it probably made sense in his tree, but not once he exported it as an email instead of syncing with git natively. I also suspect that the whole series was re-ordered in email (or by you reading/applying them in a different order). Since now the revert of the "disable MSI" happens *before* the patch that looks like it will fix the issue. So I think David also probably didn't number his patches. Linus