From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753387AbXJWGgb (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:36:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752491AbXJWGgR (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:36:17 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:33439 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752235AbXJWGgQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:36:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:35:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Mark Lord , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Regression: 2.6.23-rc9 okay, 2.6.23.1 resume problems In-Reply-To: <200710230113.25667.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: References: <4712786B.3040009@rtr.ca> <200710170207.02732.rjw@sisk.pl> <471CAF88.2010806@rtr.ca> <200710230113.25667.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 22 October 2007 16:11, Mark Lord wrote: > > Rafael, > > > > What happens to the jiffies variable on resume from RAM, and from DISK? > > Do we restore it to the value it had at suspend, > > or just leave it be with whatever? > > > > The answer has to be "restore the value it had at suspend time", > > but I figured I'd check here anyway. > > > > ?? > > Well, frankly, I've lost track of that recently, but it seems that we just use > the pre-suspend jiffies (at least in the current -git). > > Thomas knows better, I guess. :-) We use the pre-suspend value if nothing else fiddled in the variable. tglx