From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759557AbYABUwc (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:52:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754351AbYABUwY (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:52:24 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:49002 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753887AbYABUwY (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:52:24 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:52:18 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Jan Engelhardt cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , davem@davemloft.net, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use __u64 in aligned_u64's definition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > please cherrypick 35f2e577e432b28969710bc1fd4d9a4c0875f81b from > the git://computergmbh.de/linux repository from the "netfilter" > branch (or use patch below). Umm. This is missing an explanation of what exactly cares.. Does it actually fix some bogus warning, or is it just a cleanup? After -rc1, I care. After -rc5, I care a lot. Linus