From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Make the 32 bit Frame Pointer backtracer fall back to traditional
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:41:40 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0801111136520.3148@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080110203519.573567b7@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> What do you think of this approach instead of your proposal?
Looks ok to me. I get the feeling that we *should* be able to make the
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
..
thing be a bit cleaner with this (since you have the non-frame-pointer
thing inside the loop as well), and use one common routine for it all,
with just certain helper functions always retuning a NULL or something for
the non-frame-pointer thing.
In other words, I *think* the non-frame-pointer case should always be
doable as a "series of single-word unverified frames", but if that kind of
cleanup doesn't work, I certainly don't hate your patch either..
(I also wonder if we should limit the number of entries we print out.
Sometimes the stack frame ends up being so deep that we lose the
*important* stuff. I think it might be good idea to have some rule like
"the first 5 entries go to the screen, the rest will be KERN_DEBUG and
only go to the logs by default" - so a "dmesg" would show it all, but if
the machine is hung, the screen won't have been scrolled away from all
the other things by a long backtrace!)
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-11 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-10 6:05 Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-10 6:21 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-01-10 12:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-10 15:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-10 6:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-10 16:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-10 16:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-11 4:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-11 11:54 ` Olaf Dietsche
2008-01-11 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-01-11 19:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-11 22:01 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.00.0801111136520.3148@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®