mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI?  (was Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:20:51 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803121502450.3557@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080312212704.GA16836@kroah.com>



On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> Ok, I think I got it.  And it looks like an ACPI bug, but one that we
> might have been ignoring for a long time...

I still think that the fact that it regressed in that PCI patch means that 
there is simply something wrong with the patch. At the very least that 
patch changed behaviour, which was *not* what it was claiming it was 
doing.

I do think it's triggered by the "acpi=noirq" setting: that means that 
ACPI *won't* disable the legacy scan. Now, admittedly that's a really odd 
thing to do, and I think it's really strange how pci_acpi_init() does that

	pcibios_scanned++;

in a place where it is not actually scanning the bus, so I do agree that 
ACPI is doing something really odd here, but the fact is, this code all 
used to work.

Can we please just fix the regression caused by that offending patch?  In 
other words: why did that patch change behaviour AT ALL?

Quite frankly, we're too late in the game to say "this exposed some other 
long-time bug". That *particular* patch needs to be fixed, or reverted. We 
can look at changing ACPI in 2.6.26, not in -rc6.

				Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-12 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-10 23:14 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-11  0:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-11  1:05   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-11  2:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-11  3:00     ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-11  8:28       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-11 18:57     ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-11 22:41       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-12 20:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 20:32           ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 21:27             ` pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24) Greg KH
2008-03-12 21:38               ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 22:25                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 22:54                   ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 23:09                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-13  4:48                       ` Greg KH
2008-03-13  5:44                       ` Greg KH
2008-03-13  6:24                         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-13 10:07                           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-13 10:06                         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-13 15:32                           ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 21:41               ` Len Brown
2008-03-12 22:20               ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-03-12 22:34                 ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 23:02                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 23:16                     ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 23:32                       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-12 23:37                         ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 23:35                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 23:17                     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-12 23:37                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 23:47                         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-17 19:20         ` 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 Jeff Garzik
2008-03-11 12:22 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-11 13:04   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-17 21:28     ` Thomas Meyer
2008-03-19  9:15       ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-12 22:12 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-12 23:01   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-13  5:03 ` David Chinner
2008-03-13 21:12   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.00.0803121502450.3557@woody.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®