From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754561AbYDES6X (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:58:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752770AbYDES6Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:58:16 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:47761 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752756AbYDES6P (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:58:15 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:57:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Natalie Protasevich Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10349 > Subject : regression: am-utils stopped working in 2.6.25-rc* > Submitter : Meelis Roos > Date : 2008-03-28 15:20 (7 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/28/174 This seems to be a bug in am-utils: https://bugzilla.am-utils.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612 and while we try very hard to not break existing binaries that assume some old broken kernel behaviour, things like system setup code that is outright buggy is kind of exempt from that rule. So I think in this case it really is a user-level issue. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10346 > Subject : Linux 2.6.25-rc6: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2510 > Submitter : Georgi Chorbadzhiyski > Date : 2008-03-27 17:29 (8 days old) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/27/246 I wouldn't call this a regression. It's a hard-to-trigger warning that is being debugged. Linus