From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932501AbYDOUll (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:41:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756671AbYDOUl1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:41:27 -0400 Received: from dell.benran.ru ([83.149.196.126]:49707 "EHLO ari.home" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932308AbYDOUl0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:41:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:41:19 +0400 (MSD) From: "Lev A. Melnikovsky" To: Oliver Neukum cc: Rene Herman , Alessandro Suardi , David Brownell , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: ehci-hcd affects hda speed In-Reply-To: <200804152202.18358.oliver@neukum.org> Message-ID: References: <47E1B062.4060709@keyaccess.nl> <200804152202.18358.oliver@neukum.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 at 12:02am, Oliver Neukum wrote: ON> Am Dienstag, 15. April 2008 21:56:24 schrieb Lev A. Melnikovsky: ON> > The oddest peculiarity for me is the hysteretic difference between #1 and ON> > #3 states. I mean experimental data (hda throughput) depends not on the ON> > state (hardware/loaded modules), but on the path we followed. ON> ON> Did you compile with CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND? # CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND is not set Does this explain something? Thanks -L