From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936608AbYD1Qsh (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:48:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936376AbYD1QsW (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:48:22 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:52927 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936289AbYD1QsV (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:48:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:47:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Linus Torvalds cc: Harvey Harrison , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , LKML , David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops: simplify generic bit finding functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1209327591.14173.74.camel@brick> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > How about making the optimization controlled by a config switch so > > arch maintainers can decide whether they want to enable the constant > > optimization or unconditionally call the lib function ? > > No. > > This is just making that damn header line look worse and worse. > > Is there a _reason_ to optimize this stupid function this way? On architectures which have a find bit instruction we can replace the call to the library function by a single instruction when the size of the bitmap is less/equal bits per long and when the bitnr is a constant. Thanks, tglx