From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964838AbYD3Wbq (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:31:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934385AbYD3Wba (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:31:30 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:60712 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763324AbYD3Wb3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:31:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:31:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! In-Reply-To: <200805010023.32213.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: References: <20080429.190352.137408408.davem@davemloft.net> <200804302245.50817.rjw@sisk.pl> <200805010023.32213.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 May 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > And there's no way to avoid the fact that during the merge window, we will > > get something on the order of ten thousand commits (eg 2.6.24->25-rc1 was > > 9629 commits). > > Well, do we _have_ _to_ take that much? I know we _can_, but is this really > necessary? Do you want me to stop merging your code? Do you think anybody else does? Any suggestions on how to convince people that their code is not worth merging? Linus