From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@thebigcorporation.com>,
Remy Bohmer <linux@bohmer.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Preempt-RT patch for 2.6.25
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 02:13:47 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805060106460.3318@apollo.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210025532.17132.82.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 23:01 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > We have been there before. kernel development does not follow the "we
> > want _now_" principle at all. Have you ever tried to yell at Linus "we
> > want XYZ _now_" ? If you decide to try it, please keep me on CC - I
> > want to enjoy the show.
>
> Kernel development is "What is available now?" not what is avaiable in
> the future.
Interesting. I guess your universe is different from ours. According
to a well accredited dictionary:
development: the act or process of developing; growth; progress
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-06 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 18:02 Remy Bohmer
2008-05-02 18:34 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-05-02 18:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-02 18:54 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-05-02 19:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-02 19:14 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-05-03 2:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 14:21 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:01 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 16:19 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 17:04 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 18:58 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 21:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-05 22:12 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 23:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-06 0:11 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 1:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 1:43 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 8:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-06 16:01 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 0:13 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2008-05-06 1:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 2:10 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 8:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 10:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-06 16:05 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-06 17:06 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 20:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 16:17 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 16:31 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0805060106460.3318@apollo.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@bohmer.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sven@thebigcorporation.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®