From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754715AbYEGAQT (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 20:16:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752327AbYEGAQB (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 20:16:01 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:54201 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752295AbYEGAQA (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 20:16:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Ulrich Drepper cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , tglx@linutronix.de, Jeff Dike Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix UML on x86-64 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200805062304.m46N4h6d007206@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <4820EC0E.1030603@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 May 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Yes, I'll revert that commit And btw, a revert is what I'm going to do, not just bump the gcc version up as in Uli's patch. As mentioned, if it was about gcc versions, matching the x86 choice should have been the much better tested one than picking another version at random. Linus