From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761352AbYEHJ4W (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 05:56:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756291AbYEHJ4O (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 05:56:14 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:52377 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753976AbYEHJ4N (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 05:56:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 11:55:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Stephen Rothwell cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , Ingo Molnar , Greg KH , LKML , Andrew Morton , Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: linux-next: the purge :-) In-Reply-To: <20080508112130.fd574b50.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: References: <20080508112130.fd574b50.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 May 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Having published my expectations of what should be in linux-next, I am > no implementing what I think is what I said. :-) > > This is open to discussion (including suggestions about other trees). > > The following trees are being excluded from today because I think that > they contain changes that: > - have not been published/reviewed/tested sufficiently > - are not currently intended for 2.6.26 or 2.6.27. > (not all reasons apply to all trees). Please don't take offense, I am > just trying to obey my own guidelines. > > ldp > x86_latest > sched_latest > > Ingo, I assume that things will migrate from {x86,sched} latest to > for-akpm (for-next?) over time. We are working on refactoring our x86 work flow. We'll give you notice, when the dust of the demolition has settled. Thanks, tglx