From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK in pgtable_32.h
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 17:35:24 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805091733550.3197@apollo.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2ab59b40561969b7fea.1210330963@localhost>
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> ---
> include/asm-x86/pgtable_32.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/pgtable_32.h b/include/asm-x86/pgtable_32.h
> --- a/include/asm-x86/pgtable_32.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/pgtable_32.h
> @@ -98,9 +98,9 @@
> extern int pmd_bad(pmd_t pmd);
>
> #define pmd_bad_v1(x) \
> - (_KERNPG_TABLE != (pmd_val((x)) & ~(PAGE_MASK | _PAGE_USER)))
> + (_KERNPG_TABLE != (pmd_val((x)) & ~(PTE_MASK | _PAGE_USER)))
> #define pmd_bad_v2(x) \
> - (_KERNPG_TABLE != (pmd_val((x)) & ~(PAGE_MASK | _PAGE_USER | \
> + (_KERNPG_TABLE != (pmd_val((x)) & ~(PTE_MASK | _PAGE_USER | \
that's gone from mainline already. Hugh's patch restored the old pmd_bad check.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-09 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-09 11:02 [PATCH 0 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK consistently Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 1 of 8] x86: define PTE_MASK in a universally useful way Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 2 of 8] x86: fix warning on 32-bit non-PAE Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 3 of 8] x86: rearrange __(VIRTUAL|PHYSICAL)_MASK Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 4 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK in 32-bit PAE Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 5 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK in pgtable_32.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 15:35 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2008-05-09 18:36 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 6 of 8] x86: clarify use of _PAGE_CHG_MASK Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 7 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK rather than ad-hoc mask Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 8 of 8] xen: use PTE_MASK in pte_mfn() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-13 10:11 ` [PATCH 0 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK consistently Ingo Molnar
2008-05-20 7:26 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-20 7:26 ` [PATCH 5 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK in pgtable_32.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0805091733550.3197@apollo.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®