From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Austin Clements <amdragon+kernelbugzilla@mit.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] posix timers: use SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED when the timer is destroyed
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 10:24:25 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805181024050.3020@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080518171543.GA25855@tv-sign.ru>
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Initially, I did
>
> q->flags |= SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED;
> spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> q->flags &= ~SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC;
>
> to document the fact that SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED can be set lockless, but
> then "optimized" the code, couldn't help myself... Besides, the code
> above looks really confusing without the fat comment.
Oh, and the above is *wrong*.
Why?
Becayse if SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC setting needs the lock, then setting any
*other* bit in that word will also need the lock!
That's because
q->flags |= SIGQUEUE_CANCELLED;
writes those other bits too - admittedly with the value they were read
just before, but if it races with something setting SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC that
doesn't matter - the newly written version will simply be wrong.
So the rule is that if one bit of a word needs locking, then they *all*
do.
(On alpha, this is true even for whole bytes or shortwords - because a
byte/shortword write is actually "read word, update byte/short, write
word" sequence on older CPU's. So you cannot do atomic byte updates, and
need to use locks).
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-18 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-17 15:14 Oleg Nesterov
2008-05-17 15:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-05-17 17:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-18 17:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-05-18 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-05-18 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-18 17:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-05-21 2:27 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0805181024050.3020@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amdragon+kernelbugzilla@mit.edu \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®