mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] HG -> GIT migration
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 12:02:29 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805211155130.3081@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hfxsbo5nv.wl%tiwai@suse.de>



On Wed, 21 May 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> >  - cherry-pick it. Is it a small, simple patch that you want, but that 
> >    isn't really worth pulling in all the other stuff that you simply don't 
> >    know?
> > 
> >    This isn't wrong. It shouldn't be *common*, but it's not wrong to have 
> >    the same patch in two different branches. It makes sense if it is 
> >    something you really want, but it's still not important or complex 
> >    enough to actually mege everything else!
> 
> Hm, that's what I didn't consider seriously.  I thought cherry-picking
> patches may cause merge errors easily.

Cherry-picking can certainly cause merge errors, but not generally very 
often.

Cherry-picking by definition will obviously apply the *same* patch to two 
different branches, and as a result, when you merge, that merge will 
generally be totally clean. So a trivial merge that succeeds without you 
even noticing is actually the common case.

But you can certainly get merge failures where you then have to fix things 
up if there were *other* changes to that same area. At that point, you end 
up with two different branches that changed the same few lines 
differently, and it doesn't matter if then _some_ of the changes were 
identical - the fact that others were not is enough to cause a merge 
conflict.

If cherry-picking is an uncommon situation, the merge problems are not 
going to show up (and when they do, they'll generally be simple to 
resolve, especially if you limit cherry-picking to simple fixes). But if 
you do a *lot* of cherry-picking, and you cherry-pick big changes, then 
yes, you'll start hitting merge problems.

So cherry-picking is fine if you do it (a) fairly seldom and (b) just to 
small patches, because then the upsides of cherry-picking (easy to get a 
single fix without merging everything else) are bigger than the downsides 
(the potential merge problems later).

IOW, think of cherry-picking as just another tool. It has upsides and 
downsides. It's not "wrong" per se, but you can use it the wrong way. You 
shouldn't use a hammer on a screw, and you shouldn't use cherry-picking 
for big and complex stuff.

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-21 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.61.0805201314190.1798@tm8103-a.perex-int.cz>
     [not found] ` <200805211430.06653.linux@audioscience.com>
     [not found]   ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0805210805080.1798@tm8103-a.perex-int.cz>
     [not found]     ` <s5hve18vtml.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
     [not found]       ` <483415E7.5080402@keyaccess.nl>
     [not found]         ` <s5hfxsbx27f.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
2008-05-21 13:04           ` Rene Herman
2008-05-21 13:48             ` Jaroslav Kysela
2008-05-21 14:40               ` Rene Herman
2008-05-21 14:52                 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-21 15:29                   ` Rene Herman
2008-05-22  1:24                     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-05-22 20:43                       ` Rene Herman
2008-05-22 23:40                         ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-05-21 14:47             ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-21 15:40               ` Rene Herman
2008-05-21 16:02                 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-21 16:16                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-21 16:51                     ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-21 17:43                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-21 18:11                         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-21 18:25                           ` david
2008-05-21 18:39                             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-21 18:49                             ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-21 18:47                         ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-21 19:02                           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-05-21 21:08                             ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-22 14:23               ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0805211155130.3081@woody.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®